BLOG

Thoughtful Insights On The World We Live In

architecture-1048092_1920

83(b) Elections: Startup Tax Issues (Part 2)

In Part I of our Startup Tax Issues series, we discussed how to avoid penalties with valuations. But what about issues related to 83(b) elections? Startup founders or other service providers receiving restricted stock should strongly consider making an 83(b) election in the year the restricted stock is granted. The election typically results in minimal additional taxation within the year. But you could also avoid substantial taxes in future years.

What is 83(b) Election? 

A service provider makes an 83(b) election to recognize current income on equity compensation received for services subject to vesting or similar restrictions. For startups, 83(b) elections usually arise in the context of restricted stock purchased by a founder. These tax elections are subject to vesting restrictions. These restrictions typically allow the company to repurchase the unvested stock at the purchase price if the service provider stops working.

With 83(b) election, a service provider recognizes income in the current year equal to the amount of the excess of (i) the fair market value of the stock over (ii) the amount, if any, paid for the stock. This frequently results in little or no tax to the service provider in the current year. This is due to the purchase price usually being equal to the stock’s fair market value at the time of grant. As to future years, however, the election potentially saves the service provider from significant additional taxes. 

Usually, each vesting event would result in a tax on the amount of the newly-vested stock’s fair market value over the purchase price (if any) paid for that stock. As you may know, startup company common stock frequently appreciates significantly over time. In the absence of the 83(b) election, the service provider could incur significant additional taxes as the vesting events occur.

Example of 83(b) Elections

A founder purchases 100,000 shares of restricted stock from her company. Its fair market value is $0.001 per share, for a total purchase price of $100. The restricted stock vests in 25,000 share increments over the next four years. Over time, the company grows. In year two, the stock is worth $.01 per share. By year three, it is worth $1 per share. In year four, it is worth $10 per share. In year five, the company was purchased by a large competitor at $20 per share. The founder receives $2,000,000 in cash.

In scenario one, the founder promptly files her 83(b) election in year 1. Since the shares are worth $0, and because she paid $0 for them, she will have no tax in year one and will not pay taxes upon each vesting event. When she receives the cash consideration upon an exit, she will recognize $1,999,900 in capital gain income. This amount is the difference between her $100 “basis” in the shares and the consideration she received.

In scenario two, if the founder fails to file her 83(b) election. She again recognizes no tax in year one. In year two, however, when the first 25,000 shares vest, she recognizes $225 in income. That is, the $250 fair market value minus the $25 basis allocable to those vested shares. In year three, she recognized $2,475 in income ($2,500 minus $25). In year four, she recognized $24,975 in income ($25,000 minus $25). 

Finally, in year five, she recognizes $249,975 in income ($250,000 minus $25). Note that all of these amounts will be “ordinary” income and taxed at normal income tax rates. The aggregate ordinary income will be $277,650. Upon purchasing the company in year six, the founder will recognize $1,722,250 in capital gains.

83(b) Elections Have Big Benefits 

This example illustrates an additional benefit of the 83(b) election. With an election, future gains will be capital in nature and likely subject to a lower tax rate. Without the election, each vesting event will lead to ordinary income, which is frequently subject to a higher tax rate. For instance, if the long-term capital gain tax rate is 15%, our hypothetical founder’s ordinary marginal income tax rate is 28%. Assuming that the company is purchased more than one year after the final vesting event in year five, our founder pays more than $36,000 in additional tax in the scenario in which she fails to make her 83(b) election.

One important thing to note is that 83(b) elections must be made within 30 days of the date of grant of restricted stock.

Visit our list of blog articles to discover more solutions and information regarding startup regulations and taxation. 

TO ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH REQUIREMENTS IMPOSED BY THE IRS, WE INFORM YOU THAT ANY U.S. FEDERAL TAX ADVICE CONTAINED IN THIS DOCUMENT IS NOT INTENDED OR WRITTEN TO BE USED, AND CANNOT BE USED, FOR THE PURPOSE OF (I) AVOIDING PENALTIES UNDER THE INTERNAL REVENUE CODE; OR (II) PROMOTING, MARKETING OR RECOMMENDING TO ANOTHER PARTY ANY TRANSACTION OR MATTER ADDRESSED HEREIN.

Related

Spotlight on Lucha: A Story of Resilience and Community

n the heart of the South Bronx, a unique wrestling program has given rise to incredible athletes and inspired a compelling documentary, “Lucha.” This film captures the journey of a group of young women who, against all odds, found strength, community, and hope on the wrestling mat. Today, we are excited to share the story behind “Lucha” and its incredible impact on the lives of these young athletes and their community. We sat down with Josh Lee, a wrestling coach and one of the key figures behind this inspiring documentary.

>>

Understanding the FTC’s ban on noncompete clauses and what this means for your business

The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) has recently formalized a rule that will alter the landscape of noncompete clauses in employment…

>>

Corporate Transparency Act: An Essential 2024 Update

The Corporate Transparency Act (CTA) mandates domestic and foreign entities operating in the United States to report key details about their beneficial owners to the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN).…

>>

A Startup Conversation: Jim Roberts on Cultivating Entrepreneurship in Wilmington

Jim Roberts was the Founding Executive Director of the UNCW Center for Innovation and Entrepreneurship incubator and is the founder of the Network for Entrepreneurs in Wilmington (NEW) as well…

>>

Brand Protections and The Importance of A Fanciful Trademark

In the fast-paced and competitive world of business, your brand is everything. It represents your company’s identity, values, and products or services. As a law firm specializing in intellectual property…

>>

Mastering the Art of Handling Negative Online Reviews: Tips and Strategies for Business Owners

If you have been in business for any significant amount of time, you likely have received a negative online review. Depending on where the review is posted, the search engine or website may provide…

>>

THE LATEST

Spotlight on Lucha: A Story of Resilience and Community

n the heart of the South Bronx, a unique wrestling program has given rise to incredible athletes and inspired a compelling documentary, “Lucha.” This film captures the journey of a group of young women who, against all odds, found strength, community, and hope on the wrestling mat. Today, we are excited to share the story behind “Lucha” and its incredible impact on the lives of these young athletes and their community. We sat down with Josh Lee, a wrestling coach and one of the key figures behind this inspiring documentary.

Understanding the FTC’s ban on noncompete clauses and what this means for your business

The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) has recently formalized a rule that will alter the landscape of noncompete clauses in employment…

The Latest on the Corporate Transparency Act

The Corporate Transparency Act (CTA), a pivotal legislation aimed at combating financial crimes by enhancing transparency in business ownership, has…

Contact Us

Let's challenge the default together